I want to continue with Bruce Dawe and poems showing his familiarity with the military. This one is called, ‘weapons training’. When you read it you are left in no doubt
that Bruce has been part of a squad (all male) receiving instruction from a
tough drill sergeant or quarter master gunner with a touch of mongrel in him, like
how they used to be. From the poem you
would think maybe this is Bruce taking the ‘mickey’ out of the military system
and military instruction. But I don’t
think it is. I don’t think it’s as much
the satire as it first appears. It
certainly comes across as mockingly humorous with impossible personal insults,
racial slurs, low level language and cheap gags. But Bruce hasn’t made anything up here, he has
not created a pretend character with pretend lines. Nor has he created the sequence of the
training session. This is reality. Every word, every sentence in 'weapons training' is exactly as a drill
instructor (from the 1960’s, 1970’s) would have said it. I find it’s another example of the poet
listening carefully to conversation, finding the language colourful and
entertaining, and then crafting it into a great poem. The other reality thread that runs through
the poem is the style and sequence of instruction. Trainers know that there are set steps in a
lesson plan – gain attention; state the objectives; link to previous learning,
etc, etc. 'weapons training' is a true example of how a military instructor
might have delivered a training session given the circumstances and the audience
for which it was delivered back in those times.
The reason for training in weapons
training, if not in preparation for deployment to Vietnam , is certainly structured with the Vietnam
experience in mind (Charlies are coming ..; cockpit drill when you go down ..;
mob of the little yellows ..). In that
sense, the consequence of poor performance is extreme, this is life and death stuff
(dead dead dead). The instructor knows
this (may even have done his tour). In
terms of his Situational Leadership model (used by the military) he’s got a
group at ‘task readiness’ level 1. That
means he’s the one who will do the talking and the others will shut up and
listen. It takes the first eight and a
half lines for the instructor to establish his leadership position by singling
out likely troublemakers and belittling them so everybody knows their position
(no time for political correctness or hurt feelings when it could be you or
your mates who get killed, while you thought it would be fun to dick around). Then the lesson can start, ‘remember first
….’ The instructor’s tone becomes a
little friendlier. He’s set the
boundaries. Now he needs to inject a bit
of humour to soften the reality of what these people may face in the field. The final lines of the poem deal with practice
and feedback where the skill is not yet mastered and the trainer paints the
mental picture of the consequences of failure – too slow! too slow! dead dead
dead.
Interpretation
of 'weapons training' is one thing, but
what I find more interesting is how it is constructed. Bruce Dawe seems to have rendered a whole
bunch of drill instructor sayings and one liner’s into a single, natural
presentation that still manages great rhythm and ryhme. The things I notice immediately in the poem
are, only one capital letter; no commas, no full stops, extra word spacing used
to indicate a pause mid-line, and the rhyming is there but so not obvious –
ends up as a number of quatrains joined together. On the syllable count it appears to follow five
beats to the line (pentameter, classic) (iambic? maybe).
weapons training
(Bruce
Dawe, 1930 - )
And when / I say / eyes
right / I want / to hear
those eyeballs click
and the gentle pitter-patter
of falling
dandruff you there what’s the matter
why are you looking
at me are you a queer?
look to your
front if you had one more brain
it’d be lonely what are you laughing at
you in the back row
with the unsightly fat
between your elephant
ears open that drain
you call a mind and
listen remember first
the cockpit drill
when you go down be sure
the old crown jewels
are safely tucked away what could be
more
distressing than to
hold off with a burst
from your trusty
weapon a mob of the little yellows
only to find back
home because of your position
your chances of turning
the key in the ignition
considerably
reduced? allright now suppose
for the sake of
argument you’ve got
a number-one blockage
and a brand-new pack
of Charlies are
coming at you you can smell their
rotten
fish-sauce breath hot on the back
of your stupid neck
allright now what
are you going to do
about it? that’s right grab and check
the magazine man it’s
not a woman’s tit
worse luck or you’d
be set too late you nit
they’re on you and
your tripes are round your neck
you’ve copped the
bloody lot just like I said
and you know what you
are? you’re dead dead dead
For my poem and its’ link to the poet, I’m posting two that
are more inspired by ‘homecoming’ than by ‘weapons training’. I wish I’d listened more to what the drill
instructors were saying. These two poems
belong together. They are not anti-war
poems, rather an expression of the senselessness of a person getting killed in
these non-war conflicts and a protest against the way the deaths are reported
in a statistical manner. I don’t know why,
but I find I’m developing a dislike of stats – cold, hard figures that
de-humanise, but broach no argument because they are the facts and everything
has to be measured, somehow.
2004. The
evening news carries an item informing us that today the one thousandth
American soldier was killed in Iraq . This milestone was reached in less than
twelve months since the invasion.
The 1 Thousandth
Three
soldiers were killed in the latest incident
Involving
an ambush or suicide bomb or fire fight
Fought
along a rubble littered street in Baghdad
But he
was singled out as the 1 thousandth.
One
thousand blood-smeared, sagging body bags
Lifted
at the corners by four thousand buddies
Who
remember from boot camp
One
thousand NCO’s of the platoon,
Two
thousand parents,
Four
thousand grand parents
Three
thousand brothers and sisters, give or take
The
three thousand uncles and aunts,
Six
thousand cousins
A
thousand wives, sweethearts, girlfriends or lovers
Hug the
4 hundredth child
To have
his daddy taken away
In one thousand caskets draped with one thousand flags.
2012. I’m watching TV as I do every night; walk in
from work, get a glass of wine, put on ‘Who wants to be a millionaire’ or ‘Deal
or No Deal’. Then the news comes on, and I know there was another casualty in Afghanistan
(Cpl Scott Smith). A photo of the young soldier is displayed while the standard
words are read out – so official, the Prime Minister’s deep sorrow; successful
operation; struck a telling blow; disruption to the Taliban – not in vain. And
always there’s the obsession with ‘stats’. This is a report of a young life
sacrificed on behalf of the free, civilised world’s stand against terrorism,
not a bloody number. Say something human for crying out loud! Moving right
along, there’s a final insult when the report breaks to an ad with cartoon
figures acting out the benefits of chewing Extra gum after you’ve eaten.
Becoming a Statistic
It bursts,
Usually listening to Radio National and then carried
on the 6 o’clock television news channels,
Carried on shoulders, on a C-130 Hercules,
Following the ramp ceremony at Tarin Kowt,
The 39th Australian
soldier in total since 2002,
To be killed in action in Afghanistan
is shown as he was half turned, seated
in the bush-master turret,
In the studio shot now frozen
to his poor parents mantle-piece,
The 18th Member
of Special Forces,
To sigh, so young, just a kid
in need of a shave and a haircut,
and a hug, what a shame,
The 6th Elite Soldier
to be killed by an insurgent IED, and
The 15th Digger
overall, from IED’s.
Then having dealt with the statistics,
The nation returns the audience
to a most ridiculous ad break,
Knowing it’s all over ……. and we can move on,
“Bad boys! bad boys!,
What-cha gonna chew?
What-cha gonna chew,
When they come for you?
Bad boys! bad boys!”
J.O. White
No comments:
Post a Comment